Cigar Specifications
Brand / Line:
Trilogy
Cigar Name:
Cameroon Robusto
Shape:
Robusto
Country of Origin:
Honduras
Wrapper:
Cameroon
Filler:
Honduras
Binder:
Honduras
Status:
Limited
0 Recent Reviews
None yetNo recent reviews yet — be the first!
22 Archival Reviews
Show ↓📜 Archival Review
May 14, 2008
"Under Rated"
* Pre Light - Beautiful appearance, excellent construction, no soft or excessively hard spots. Smelled of dried horse sweat (nice, I grew up on a farm...I love this). Slightly Oily appearance. V-cut, perfect draw.
* Initial Light - Excellent smoke volume. Fairly even burn, beautiful mascara line. Nice ash holds well, med gray appearance, with layers of ash.
* Taste Notes - Wonderful taste, though difficult for me to dila in. Definately medium of body, with a short pleasant finish. Rich woodiness (??), some pepper, very slight spice.
Liked it a lot!
* Initial Light - Excellent smoke volume. Fairly even burn, beautiful mascara line. Nice ash holds well, med gray appearance, with layers of ash.
* Taste Notes - Wonderful taste, though difficult for me to dila in. Definately medium of body, with a short pleasant finish. Rich woodiness (??), some pepper, very slight spice.
Liked it a lot!
📜 Archival Review
October 15, 2007
"Three Years Later"
It's been three years since I last rated this gar and how appropriate since it has three sides. It was almost as good as I remembered, I wondered if it could have been overaged? Still a good tasting and burning cigar.
📜 Archival Review
July 17, 2007
"nice tri press"
aged-9 months.appearance-nice tri press.good color on the wrapper.had alot of veins but not thick veins which could affect the burn.construction-well constructed.the burn was nearly perfect.the draw was a little tight but it smoked well.flavor-real woodsy,nice flavors.i dont like cameroon wrappers that much but this one was nice.value-great value for what your getting.overall-better than i expected.a nice surprise.i would recommend to any cigar smoker of any experience level.
📜 Archival Review
March 16, 2007
"mild :("
The construction was kind of weak on this. I cut it and the end instantly unraveled. i pimped it out though and fixed it. the draw on this puppy was weak. i struggled getting any smoke out of it. the flavor was mild and woody. i sensed a hint of lime at first. near the end, the cigar was burning pretty hot and became quite bitter like a few posters said before me. below average ciggie for me
📜 Archival Review
September 21, 2006
"dissapointing"
I had high hopes for this cigar, having liked the AB Medalist...but this one just doesn't have it. Hardly any taste at all, rather mild and a little nutty/woody, and the cameroon wrapper really doesn't add much to it. A pretty boring cigar. Maybe alright if you like them mild, but I like them complex and medium to full bodied.
Burn and construction are fine.
Burn and construction are fine.
📜 Archival Review
August 11, 2006
"better"
Better than the corojo. Decent burn, little touchup. Woodsy, sweet taste, good amount of smoke. Maduro is better.
📜 Archival Review
June 7, 2006
"Good Value Cameroon"
The initial burn is even and develops a nice ash. The spice from the cameroon is an accent flavor, the way I like it. It's a nice complement to a medium bodied blend that has a woody, slightly leathery base. No particular flavor jumps out at me, just a well blended tobacco flavor that results in a nice smooth smoke. The last third is a little finicky– it burns hot, and pulling too often results in a bitter taste. Aside from that, it's a well made, balanced cigar with great spicy cameroon overtones that don't overpower the rest of the cigar.
📜 Archival Review
October 21, 2005
"Nice cigar"
This one was round. Starts mild and nutty with a sweet, dry aftertaste. Progresses to aromatic cedar wood and full flavor, still with a sweet, dry aftertaste and finish. Pepper fades, then returns somewhat near the end. Medium nicotine buzz. Very even burn. Bittered slightly near the end. Nice cigar. Worth having a few around.
📜 Archival Review
August 26, 2005
"Good cigar"
Nice looking cigar, interesting triangle shape with a nice even draw and the burn was even throughout. Woodsy and somewhat nutty. Enjoyable stick that I'll keep in the humidor. A good value IMO.
📜 Archival Review
May 8, 2005
"Not bad!"
This is a decent smoke but nothing great. Construction was pretty good and the burn is ok. The flavor spice with wood and a little sweetness to it too. Just a bit to mild for my taste though. Over all a decent smoke for the price.
📜 Archival Review
April 15, 2005
"Sweet Suprise"
Actually a very nice cigar for the price. Started out mild and sweet, with fruity hints and loads of smoke. Burned even with a easy draw. Halfway through turned more woodsy, with hints of leather and nuts. Just a touch bitter the last inch or so, but didn't detract much from the smoke. The triangle cut was interesting but didn't add or subtract for me.
📜 Archival Review
April 1, 2005
"tres unique"
this stick seems to be a love it or hate it. I am in the middle, as the shape is different, but not a plus or minus to my experience.
📜 Archival Review
March 24, 2005
"All wrapper"
The wrapper carries the flavor in this cigar. My stick burned uneven. Starts off spicy and trails with wood hints. Finish was longer than I expected.. The triangle feel was unique but did not enhance the experience. Mild cigar.
📜 Archival Review
January 10, 2005
"well i guess the triangle can work"
i usually tend to shy away from gimmicky features but after hearing good things about this line i decided to pick one up and at 3 bucks it was a solid cigar. generally mild start with a pleasant tobacco smell, but almost too mild for my tastes. kept waiting for some more flavor and that came about halfway through when it turned into more of a medium bodied smoke. the draw was great and i really enjoyed the triangular shape, it just felt good in the hand. the burn was a bit uneven but this eventually evened out. all in all a solid smoke and a nice change with the triangular shape
📜 Archival Review
October 13, 2004
"Simply mild"
Very different triangular shape - did not cause any draw or burn problems though. Smooth tan wrapper, firm feel. Sweet, woodsy tobacco flavors throughout ... mild strength ... got almost boring by the end. Good morning smoke.
📜 Archival Review
August 25, 2004
"What the hell are they thinking?"
I know, it's all marketing. But to take a nice Cameroon cigar that burns well and has all of the spice and goodness the wrapper has to give, and then press it into an unnatural shape... it's blasphemy!
📜 Archival Review
July 20, 2004
"Very nice cigar. I'd certainly try it again."
This is a very complex cigar. I enjoy cameroon wrapper cigars from time to time, and this is no exception. It's plain good, and deserves a place in every humidor. Sweet-smoking, smooth, but the occasional touch of bitterness keeps this stick from being a 9 or a 10.
📜 Archival Review
May 30, 2004
"Good sample."
Bought one in a sampler. Mild to medium bodied cigar dominated by the flavor of the cameroon wrapper. Well constructed and tasty if you are a cammy lover. Will not overpower your tastebuds or beverage. The triangle shape didn't affect the smoking experience one way or the other.
📜 Archival Review
April 22, 2004
"Worthy"
An interesting taste with a little zing. I like the shape and build. Not as good as the Cojo but it's definitely worth a try.
📜 Archival Review
March 12, 2004
"Interesting"
Not a bad cigar but the shape make's it work like a dribble-cup for me.Round or square work's,but no more Triangles for me.Reminded me of a dry cuesta-rey.
📜 Archival Review
February 3, 2004
"Poor Man's Gurkha"
A mild to medium cigar that is exceptionally smooth and satisfying.
📜 Archival Review
January 19, 2004
"Good Smoke"
Other than the intresting triangle box press nothing stood out as unbelievable in this cigar. The construction, draw, taste, and burn were all slightly above average. At the reasonable prices I have seen this cigar at, I would be happy too keep a box of these on hand.
Add Your Review
Share your experience with this cigar. All reviews are moderated before appearing on the site.