Avo Robusto

I agree with the previous review... this isn't as good as the signature or 787 series, but those two are at the top of the line for AVO cigars. This one had the same great construction and the same perfect draw and burn you expect from AVOs. Flavors of wood, leather and spice throughout. A nice long ash with creamy smoke. A good mild cigar.

Beautifully made as you would expect from Davidoff; but the cigar, yet creamy is vegetal. The regular AVO line is one to pass up for the Signature--which is quite a satisfying cigar.

Found this buried in the humidor I bought from an ex-smoker. Loved it. Aroma and taste had notes of baked goods and spice, like the CAO Gold. Sure it's mild, but not all of us enjoy strong cigars that torch your tongue or give you a burning feeling at the back of your throat. I smoke to relax, not to feel like I have heartburn. I'm getting more of these.

Bought a box of these for $160 for my girlfriends father, gave them to him, then we smoked. Nice cigar in the mild-mid range, burned well with good flavor, woody, creamy, didn't have to relight once. Overall a very pleasant experience.

Smoked one from a tube. Excellent construction and draw. Overall profile is slightly stronger than macs but with a more developed tastes of wood and cream.Beginners can't go wrong

I smoke AVO XO, Ashton VSG, Davidoff 2000, but this cigar work extermely well with my palate. Perfect roll, coffe, walnut taste, nto over powering .

Mild to moderate cigar that had a good draw, lots of smoke and good even flavor

this was a non-spectacular cigar but not bad, its construction and burn were very good and the flavor and aroma were both good, just nothing great i still prefer the maduro the best in the AVO line

I’m at a loss to describe this cigar, I can only tell you what it wasn’t. It wasn’t, spicy, or flavorful, and it didn’t have much body. It wasn’t bitter, sour, biting, or acrid. It wasn’t good, but it wasn’t bad either. I don’t recommend it because it didn’t stand out in any way. I’ve smoked better cigars for less money, and worse cigars that cost a lot more. In my opinion, a good cigar should give you a reason to smoke it, this one did not. The only good note is that it drew and burned perfectly, I hate a cigar that I have to futz around with, and this one was perfectly rolled. Bad construction can ruin a good cigar, but unfortunately good construction can not save a mediocre cigar. Perhaps it’s unfair, but it’s true.

While I like maduro's better, I received this as part of a sampler pack. I thought it was pretty good. It had a couple of tastes, not the richest, but not bad. I think this is actually better than Monte Cristo, Romeo, or Macanudo. I would recommend this cigar for a decent natural taste.

Decent looking cigar that gave the correct impression of being on the mild side. Started out with a peanut.almond flavor that picked up a little wood and body as it went along. Sadly, a metallic taste came in and out as well. About half way through, a pleasing taste that I just couldn't put my finger on popped up briefly. Draw was fine, but the burn was off for most of the cigar. A decent cigar that paired favorably with coffee.

Next to the Montecristo robusto I would say this is the best out there. The value was great for such a smoke. The flavor never waiverd from a mild oak taste and burned great.

A nice cigar that's mild with no harshness from start to finish.