Cigar Specifications
Brand / Line:
Te-Amo
Cigar Name:
Robusto
Shape:
Robusto
Country of Origin:
Mexico
Wrapper:
Mexico
Filler:
Mexico
Binder:
Mexico
Status:
Active
0 Recent Reviews
None yetNo recent reviews yet — be the first!
13 Archival Reviews
Show ↓📜 Archival Review
March 5, 2026
A good smoke for the money. Good everydaym stogie
📜 Archival Review
February 15, 2008
"Very Good"
I do not understand all the negative comments. I thought the cigar was well constructed and a darn fine smoke. I understand that some people do not like Mexican tobacco.
Lots of smoke, long ash and has a distinct earthy flavor.
I would recommend purchasing a single and seeing if it is your cup of tea. However, I keep plenty of these in my humi.
Lots of smoke, long ash and has a distinct earthy flavor.
I would recommend purchasing a single and seeing if it is your cup of tea. However, I keep plenty of these in my humi.
📜 Archival Review
February 15, 2008
"Very Good Smoke"
I do not understand all the negative comments. I thought the cigar was well constructed and a darn fine smoke. I understand that some people do not like Mexican tobacco.
Lots of smoke, long ash and has a distinct earthy flavor.
I would recommend purchasing a single and seeing if it is your cup of tea. However, I keep plenty of these in my humi.
Lots of smoke, long ash and has a distinct earthy flavor.
I would recommend purchasing a single and seeing if it is your cup of tea. However, I keep plenty of these in my humi.
📜 Archival Review
January 8, 2008
"Yuck!"
The cigar is lightly filled and the draw was too easy. It tasted like an oversized cigarette...YUCK!
📜 Archival Review
December 21, 2007
"Wish I had that 45 minutes back"
Not bad looking, easy draw, no burn issues to speak of but, really lacking in the taste department. I wonder who they keep making them for?
📜 Archival Review
February 1, 2007
"ug"
I gave this one another chance...because I had one in the humidor and I hate to throw away cigars. I should have ignored that policy. This cigar uses poor tasting filler and amazingly it gets WORSE with age. I could not pick up anything from this except harsh smoke and a bitter aftertaste that just wont go away. There are better mexican cigars out there.
📜 Archival Review
October 8, 2006
"gag!"
I was apprehensious about trying a Mexican cigar, but the local shop said these were solid, cheap smokes. I never should have trusted, was sickened and distgusted. Just toss a tobacco wrapper around a long, dead cockroach and that is about the closest description I can give to this piece of garbage.
📜 Archival Review
September 24, 2006
"Aye yae yae"
So far, this is the first mexican cigar that I have tried that fits the poor description of mexican cigars that many people seem to hold. In fact, I have found a variety of mexican cigars to be quite good. This one tasted musty and of old dirt. The flavor was persistent to the end. The construction was the only plus point to this cigar.
📜 Archival Review
May 3, 2005
"Poopy diaper"
This review is for maduro. I smoked this one in my work van after lunch. Not too impressed. Lots of tunnels in the first 3 inches, causing uneven burn and wierd ash troubles. Flavor wasn't all bad, but a lot harsher than the Meditation maduro I smoked, probably due to the larger ring guage. The most notable flavor I detected was barnyard. After leaving my vehicle for a few minutes, I returned to the smell of manure and garbage...experienced quite offensive odors after smoking this one, like sitting in a stinky, stuffy cow barn. Or driving behind a garbage truck with your windows down on a 100 degree day. I suggest if you smoke one, do it outside and leave when you're done, or you might pass out.
📜 Archival Review
June 2, 2004
"Pretty Decent"
I disagree with the rest of the reviewers here. If you smoke this one fresh, they are right - it's pretty harsh and tasteless. But if you put this one in the humidor for a month, the taste is pretty good, and the aroma is absolutely incredible. The cigar is constructed incredibly well also. The negatives to this one are a draw that is too easy and its size, which i'm not a fan of because i prefer cigars with a smaller diameter. Overall, a great smoke for the size and money.
📜 Archival Review
March 15, 2004
"No....no...no...never again"
This was bad. I do not like Mexican cigars. To me, they always stink, even before they are lit. The taste was bad...almost "soily" tasting. Construction was not good either. Not my cup of tea
📜 Archival Review
February 6, 2003
"A harsh cigar"
A harsh cigar that scorches the tongue. Soily taste, and poor burn.
📜 Archival Review
August 16, 2002
"Not for me"
This is not what I like in a smoke. Burn was very uneven and hot. It also lacked something very important...Taste!
Add Your Review
Share your experience with this cigar. All reviews are moderated before appearing on the site.